Two lawmakers have initiated a potential congressional sanction against the Department of Justice, accusing it of failing to release all documents related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein by a legally mandated deadline. Representatives Ro Khanna, a Democrat from California, and Thomas Massie, a Republican from Kentucky, are leading efforts to ensure full transparency regarding Epstein’s files, which they argue have been inadequately disclosed and heavily redacted.
During an appearance on CBS’s Face the Nation, Massie stated, “I think the most expeditious way to get justice for these victims is to bring inherent contempt against Pam Bondi.” He and Khanna are currently drafting a proposal to pursue this action. Inherent contempt allows Congress to impose fines or arrest officials who obstruct its legislative functions, a power not utilized successfully since the 1930s, according to the American Bar Association.
Khanna emphasized that the House of Representatives would not require Senate approval to take such measures, expressing confidence in garnering bipartisan support for holding Attorney General Pam Bondi accountable.
Justice Department Defends Document Release
In response to the lawmakers’ concerns, the Justice Department defended its recent partial release of Epstein-related documents. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche asserted that the released materials complied with the Epstein Files Transparency Act. He noted that the department has a team of hundreds of lawyers reviewing the remaining documents to safeguard victims’ information.
Despite the Justice Department’s assurances, dissatisfaction persists among lawmakers from both parties. Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky remarked on ABC’s This Week that any indication of incomplete disclosure will continue to haunt the department, urging it to release all available information.
Blanche, however, dismissed the threats of contempt, stating, “Not even a little bit. Bring it on.” He contended that those criticizing Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel lack a full understanding of the situation.
Controversial Photographs and Document Management
The recent document release included a photograph depicting a desk cluttered with images, one of which featured former President Donald Trump. Following the release, this image was temporarily removed from the Justice Department’s “Epstein Library” but was later reinstated after a review concluded that it did not depict any victims.
The Justice Department clarified on social media that the image had been flagged for review out of caution. Blanche explained that the department is responsive to concerns raised by victims or their advocates regarding any content shared publicly. He emphasized that the department does not redact information related to Trump or any other individual involved with Epstein, but takes appropriate measures based on victim feedback.
Additionally, the Justice Department released a new version of the grand jury transcript concerning Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell, reducing the prior extensive redactions. The department stated, “Documents and photos will continue to be reviewed consistent with the law and with an abundance of caution for victims and their families.”
As the situation unfolds, lawmakers remain vigilant in their pursuit of accountability and transparency regarding the Epstein files, highlighting the ongoing demand for justice for the victims involved in this high-profile case.
