In a recent commentary, Jeffrey M. Landaw challenges the notion of an isolationist America as proposed by some political commentators, including Bruce Fein. Landaw argues that the United States’ economic and political interests extend well beyond its borders, a perspective that has become increasingly relevant in light of global tensions.
Landaw highlights the actions of global powers such as Russia, China, North Korea, and Iran, suggesting they operate under principles reminiscent of ancient historian Thucydides: “The strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must.” This approach starkly contrasts with the diplomatic ideals espoused by former President John Quincy Adams and the cooperative framework of the Concert of Europe.
Many observers, including those with conservative credentials, have recognized the shifting dynamics in international relations. Landaw posits that if John Quincy Adams were alive today, he would likely acknowledge the current geopolitical landscape, which necessitates a more engaged U.S. foreign policy.
The historical context of the original America First movement, which advocated for a hands-off approach during the conflicts involving Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin, serves as a cautionary tale. Landaw asserts that the isolationist strategy of the past ultimately failed to protect personal and political freedoms. He argues that today’s proponents of an isolationist stance are similarly misguided.
The commentary raises important questions about the future of U.S. foreign policy. As global challenges continue to escalate, the debate surrounding America’s role on the world stage remains critical. Landaw’s perspective prompts a reevaluation of defense strategies in an era where isolationism may no longer be a viable option.
In conclusion, the conversation around America’s defense strategy reflects broader themes of global engagement and responsibility. As the world becomes increasingly interconnected, understanding the implications of U.S. foreign policy decisions is essential for fostering stability and freedom both domestically and internationally.
