Woodside Energy Group and Bloom Energy, both listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), are significant players in the energy sector. A recent analysis evaluates their strengths across various metrics, including institutional ownership, valuation, and profitability. This comparison highlights the performance of these companies and provides insights for potential investors.
Volatility and Risk Assessment
Understanding stock volatility is crucial for investors. Woodside Energy Group has a beta of 0.4, indicating that its stock price is approximately 60% less volatile than the S&P 500 index. In contrast, Bloom Energy has a beta of 3.01, suggesting its stock is 201% more volatile than the market benchmark. This significant difference in volatility may influence investor decisions based on their risk tolerance.
Earnings and Valuation Comparison
The financial performance of both companies reveals distinct differences. Woodside Energy Group has reported higher revenue and earnings per share compared to Bloom Energy. The exact figures underscore Woodside’s robust operational framework, which is underpinned by its extensive portfolio of assets, including interests in liquefied natural gas and crude oil production.
Additionally, analyst recommendations play a pivotal role in stock evaluation. According to data from MarketBeat.com, Bloom Energy has a consensus price target of $100.57, which suggests a potential downside of 30.46% from its current price. This projection indicates that analysts view Bloom Energy as a more favorable investment option, despite its higher volatility.
Profitability and Ownership Insights
Profitability metrics also provide valuable insights into these companies’ financial health. A comparison of net margins, return on equity, and return on assets reveals that Woodside maintains a competitive edge in profitability, which could appeal to conservative investors.
Institutional ownership reflects market confidence. Only 3.2% of Woodside Energy Group shares are held by institutional investors, while a substantial 77.0% of Bloom Energy shares are owned by institutions. This disparity could suggest that larger investors have greater faith in Bloom’s potential for future growth.
Insider ownership also varies significantly, with Woodside Energy Group having 0.0% of its shares held by company insiders compared to 3.6% for Bloom Energy. Strong institutional and insider ownership often indicates a belief in long-term value, which can influence stock performance.
Company Profiles
Woodside Energy Group, founded in 1954 and headquartered in Perth, Australia, is involved in the exploration, production, and marketing of hydrocarbons across multiple regions, including the Asia Pacific and Africa. The company focuses on liquefied natural gas, pipeline gas, crude oil, and natural gas liquids, with several key projects such as the Pluto LNG and North West Shelf.
Bloom Energy, established in 2001 and based in San Jose, California, specializes in solid-oxide fuel cell systems for on-site power generation. Its technology converts a variety of fuels into electricity without combustion, catering to a diverse range of industries including utilities and healthcare.
In summary, while Bloom Energy outperforms Woodside Energy Group in certain metrics, particularly in institutional ownership and analyst sentiment, Woodside maintains stronger revenue and profitability figures. Investors must weigh these factors carefully when considering investment opportunities in the energy sector.
