The newly elected governor of Virginia, Abigail Spanberger, has unveiled a controversial tax proposal that includes increases on various services, igniting debate across the state. The suggested tax hikes encompass services such as dog walking and grooming, alongside levies on firearms, ammunition, storage facilities, dry cleaning, home repairs, food delivery services, and package deliveries. Notably, Spanberger intends to introduce a personal property tax on electric leaf blowers and landscaping equipment, while excluding gas-powered alternatives.
These proposals come at a time when Virginia is experiencing a significant budget surplus of $572 million, a legacy left by former governor Glenn Youngkin after his term ended last month. Over his single term, Youngkin’s administration achieved four consecutive years of budget surpluses, totaling nearly $10 billion in surplus revenue. This financial stability was largely attributed to tax cuts and an economic environment designed to attract businesses and incentivize taxpayers.
Despite these achievements, the proposed tax increases by Spanberger have raised eyebrows, particularly as they appear to conflict with Youngkin’s successful economic strategies. Traditionally, Virginia’s political landscape has shifted towards tax increases and expanded spending, which critics argue can lead to counter-productive outcomes.
In addition to the service taxes, Spanberger is advocating for a rise in the top marginal tax rate. Some proposals suggest a rate of 10 percent on incomes exceeding $1 million, with others pushing for a more substantial increase to 13.8 percent. If implemented, Virginia could surpass California, earning the distinction of having the highest state tax rate in the United States.
The sentiment among many Virginians seems to echo a desire for lower taxes and economic growth, as evidenced by the recent migration of residents from high-tax states like New York and New Jersey to states with no income tax, such as Florida and Texas. This trend raises concerns that the proposed tax increases could further exacerbate the outflow of residents and businesses seeking more favorable economic conditions.
Spanberger campaigned as a “moderate” Democrat, a label that has not been substantively challenged by the media. The definition of “moderate” typically connotes a balanced approach to governance, but many observers are questioning whether her proposed policies align with that characterization. Critics argue that the proposed tax increases starkly contrast with the principles of moderation and fiscal responsibility.
The outcomes of the recent elections suggest that dissatisfaction with the Democratic Party’s positions on various issues has played a role in their electoral challenges. While Democrats won certain special elections, the victories appear more connected to broader sentiments against former President Donald Trump rather than an endorsement of the party’s policies.
If Spanberger’s tax proposals are enacted, experts predict that many Virginians, particularly those who benefited from Youngkin’s policies, may join the growing exodus to states with more favorable tax environments. As Virginia navigates this complex political and economic landscape, the implications of these proposed tax hikes will likely resonate throughout the state, influencing both current residents and future economic prospects.
Readers can share their thoughts with Cal Thomas at [email protected]. Look for Cal Thomas’ latest book, A Watchman in the Night: What I’ve Seen Over 50 Years Reporting on America, published by HumanixBooks.
