Connect with us

Lifestyle

Cañon City Proposes 2.25% Tax to Fund Community Pool Projects

editorial

Published

on

Cañon City is poised to implement a 2.25% excise tax on amusements and experiences to support the operation of a community pool facility. This proposal follows a strong community vote backing the pool, which is seen as essential for local youth development and recreation. The tax will primarily affect tourists visiting the area, ensuring that residents bear little of the financial burden.

The city has seen significant growth in recent years. Businesses along Main Street are flourishing, revitalizing the historic downtown. Landmark buildings are undergoing restoration, while new ventures contribute to a vibrant atmosphere. Notably, the redevelopment of the Holy Cross Abbey under the leadership of the Ary family is another positive development. The river corridor plan is also progressing, with the recent acquisition of the Skyline Steel property and anticipated purchase of the Black Hills property at First Street, enhancing the connectivity and vibrancy of the riverfront.

Local education is also thriving. The RE-1 School District, led by Superintendent Adam Hartman, is investing in state-of-the-art facilities and making significant renovations to support the community’s youth.

Taylor Edrington, owner of Royal Gorge Anglers and a long-time resident, emphasizes the importance of the Arkansas River in the community. As a passionate boating and fly-fishing enthusiast, he highlights the need for safe water access for young people, which he believes can be supported through the proposed tax.

Edrington argues that the 2.25% excise tax is a fair means to fund the community pool, noting that the majority of the tax burden would fall on visitors rather than local residents. “The overwhelming majority of those paying will be visitors, not Fremont County locals,” he stated.

He clarified that the tax will not specifically target the Royal Gorge Route Railroad. Instead, it will apply uniformly to all businesses in the city offering experiences, including fly-fishing trips. “Our guide trips average more than four times the price of an average RGRR train ticket,” Edrington explained, asserting that clients will view the tax as a minimal addition to their costs.

Furthermore, he counters claims that the tax could harm local tourism. According to industry reports, tourism in Colorado has grown by over 30% in the past decade, with a nearly 3% increase expected in 2025. Edrington asserts that the unique experiences available in Cañon City will continue to attract visitors, regardless of the small tax.

There has been misinformation circulating regarding the applicability of the tax to the Royal Gorge Route Railroad. Edrington clarified that the 4-R Act of 1976 does not exempt private tourist trains, such as the Royal Gorge Route. “The train operates as a for-profit tourist business and is subject to this excise tax just like everyone else,” he stated.

Edrington expresses concern over the tactics employed by a small group of individuals, including Mark and Dawn Greksa of the Royal Gorge Route Railroad, who he claims are spreading false narratives to protect their interests. He believes these actions could create division within the community.

As Cañon City moves forward, Edrington calls for unity and clarity in supporting community projects. “We know investing in our youth, our facilities, and our shared future benefits everyone,” he stated.

The community is encouraged to vote in favor of measure 2B, which aims to bolster local recreation and education initiatives. Edrington’s message is clear: Cañon City is on a path of progress, and together, the community can enhance its future through informed decision-making.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © All rights reserved. This website offers general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information provided. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult relevant experts when necessary. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of the information on this site.