Arizona Senator Ruben Gallego has called for a complete overhaul of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency, criticizing its current operations and leadership under President Donald Trump. His statements come in response to the shooting death of Minnesota resident Renee Good, which has ignited nationwide protests and renewed scrutiny of ICE’s role in immigration enforcement.
During a recent interview, Gallego expressed his view that ICE, as it stands, is failing to serve the needs of American communities. He described the agency as needing to be “totally torn down,” arguing that it should be restructured to focus on serious criminal activity rather than pursuing individuals solely for their immigration status. This sentiment reflects a growing demand among some Democratic lawmakers for significant changes within the agency, especially in light of incidents like Good’s death, which critics allege highlight a pattern of excessive force.
The Trump administration defended the actions of the ICE officer involved, stating that the officer acted in self-defense against an alleged attempt to run them over. Gallego countered this narrative by highlighting the public’s perception of ICE, referencing a recent CNN poll indicating that over half of Americans believe ICE makes cities less safe. The senator pointed out that people in his home state of Arizona want an immigration enforcement agency that prioritizes the apprehension of criminals rather than those who are simply seeking a better life.
In his remarks, Gallego criticized the current approach of ICE, labeling it a “goon squad” that operates in a manner reminiscent of oppressive regimes. He stated, “What we’re seeing right now is not what we want from ICE.” He emphasized the necessity of creating an agency that focuses on ensuring security while respecting the dignity of individuals involved in immigration processes.
The response from the White House was swift. Abigail Jackson, a spokeswoman for Trump, dismissed Gallego’s remarks as politically motivated, accusing him of pandering to the far-left of the Democratic Party. “Gallego should commend our brave law enforcement officers instead of siding with criminals,” Jackson asserted, emphasizing ICE’s role in removing individuals who pose a threat to public safety.
The controversy surrounding ICE and its operations continues to spark debate across the political spectrum. Advocates for reform argue that the agency’s current practices contribute to a climate of fear among immigrant communities, while supporters maintain that stringent immigration enforcement is essential for public safety. As discussions evolve, the future of ICE and its mandate remains a contentious issue in American politics.
