During a heated interview on CNN, Rep. Ben Cline (R-VA) faced tough questions from anchor Boris Sanchez regarding the recent revelations in a Vanity Fair article about the inner workings of the Trump administration. The discussion, which took place on March 15, 2024, focused on comments made by White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, particularly her acknowledgment that former President Trump does not start his day contemplating retribution but will seize opportunities for it when they arise.
Accountability and Oversight in Focus
Sanchez pressed Cline on how these revelations may affect the perception of the Republican Party, questioning whether they risk appearing as facilitators of Trump’s desire for “payback.” Cline responded by highlighting the role of the Judiciary Committee in conducting oversight over the Department of Justice. He stated, “The Judiciary Committee is conducting its constitutional duty of oversight over the Department of Justice,” emphasizing that they are following taxpayer spending, which he claimed exceeded $50 million aimed at targeting Trump and conservative members of Congress.
The conversation then shifted to the topic of expiring subsidies from the Affordable Care Act, but Sanchez returned to the Vanity Fair article, probing further into Wiles’ remarks about Venezuela. He quoted her statement that Trump intends to “keep on blowing up boats until Nicolás Maduro cries uncle,” referencing the recent announcement of a blockade against sanctioned oil tankers in Venezuelan waters.
Congressional Authority and Military Action
Sanchez questioned at what point the president needs Congressional authority for military actions, suggesting that lawmakers should have a say in such matters. Cline appeared supportive of the administration’s stance, asserting that Congressional oversight is ongoing. He mentioned that both the Secretary of State and Secretary of Defense provided a confidential briefing to House and Senate members, explaining the legal justifications for military strikes, which he assured were constitutional.
Despite Cline’s reassurances, Sanchez pressed for clarity, pointing out that Wiles’ comments hinted at a desire for regime change, an action that traditionally requires Congressional approval. Cline claimed he had not read the Vanity Fair article but maintained that Congress will continue to oversee the president’s actions to ensure they align with the law.
As the interview concluded, Sanchez encouraged Cline to read the article to fully understand the implications of Wiles’ statements, which he described as a “long read” but one that would be worthwhile.
The exchange highlights the ongoing tension between the Trump administration’s approach to foreign policy and the responsibilities of Congress in overseeing military actions, a topic that remains contentious among lawmakers and the public alike.
