The Republican primary for the Texas Railroad Commission has drawn attention as candidates emphasize the need for reform within an agency often criticized for its close ties to the oil and gas industry. As voters prepare for the upcoming election, three candidates have emerged, highlighting conflicts of interest and calling for greater transparency in the commission’s operations.
Among the candidates, Katherine Culbert, a process safety engineer, stands out for her experience and commitment to ensuring that the commission prioritizes the safety of workers and communities. At 50 years old, Culbert advocates for a proactive approach to managing issues such as orphan wells, which she argues exemplify the commission’s failure to effectively address environmental concerns. In a recent voter guide, she stated, “When a plugged well leaks, the Commission needs to take responsibility for the well, no matter the history.”
Culbert’s perspective reflects a growing sentiment that the Texas Railroad Commission has become a “rubber-stamp” agency, failing to uphold its regulatory responsibilities. Her concerns align with those of fellow candidates, Hawk Dunlap and James Matlock, who also emphasize the need for significant changes within the agency. Dunlap, aged 55, has extensive experience in oil fields globally and highlights the burden placed on landowners who often must hire legal representation to navigate issues that the commission should address. Matlock, 53, has proposed a rebranding of the agency to better reflect its responsibilities and expand its oversight to include a broader range of energy sources in Texas.
While all three candidates share similar goals, there are notable differences in their campaign financing. According to the Texas Ethics Commission, Culbert has raised approximately $7,000, while Dunlap has garnered around $65,000. Matlock has stated he is self-financing his campaign. In contrast, incumbent Jim Wright has reported contributions exceeding $440,000, with a significant portion linked to the oil industry. Wright’s recent recusal from a vote related to an oilfield waste company, due to financial ties, has sparked discussions about potential conflicts of interest within the commission.
Culbert has voiced strong opinions regarding the necessity for mandatory recusal in situations where conflicts arise. She asserts, “Recusal needs to be mandatory,” emphasizing that the perception of bias can undermine public trust in regulatory bodies. The need for reform in the Texas Railroad Commission is evident, as its reputation has deteriorated to the point of becoming a subject of critique in popular culture, including its portrayal in Taylor Sheridan’s series, Landman.
As the primary approaches, the candidates’ positions resonate with a public increasingly aware of the importance of integrity and accountability in regulatory agencies. The Texas Railroad Commission, once a powerful entity in overseeing the state’s oil and gas industry, now faces scrutiny and demands for change from its electorate.
The outcome of the Republican primary could signal a pivotal shift in how the commission operates and its relationship with the industries it regulates. As these candidates advocate for a more transparent and responsible agency, the implications for the environment and public trust in governance remain significant.
Readers are encouraged to share their thoughts on this critical election by submitting letters to the editor through the provided guidelines.
