URGENT UPDATE: Eric Trump has publicly defended the White House ballroom project, calling it the “most incredible gift” from his father, President Donald Trump. Speaking to Newsmax on October 23, 2025, Trump vehemently disputed claims made by House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) that the project is a “pay-to-play” scheme.
In a passionate response, Eric Trump emphasized that his father self-funded his initial campaign and donates his presidential salary to charity. “This is going to be the most incredible gift that Donald Trump can give the United States,” he stated, refuting Jeffries’ allegations of corruption.
The ballroom, currently under construction at the White House, is reportedly funded through private donations, a detail Eric Trump highlighted during his interview. He criticized Jeffries for misunderstanding the president’s intentions, firmly stating, “No one else could pull off what Donald Trump is doing.”
With a projected cost of $250 million, the ballroom aims to provide a more functional and aesthetically pleasing space for presidential events. Eric Trump asserted that the new venue will pay for itself by eliminating the need for costly off-site gatherings. “From a security standpoint, this thing will actually pay for itself many times over,” he explained.
The ballroom is set to feature vaulted windows, stone columns, chandeliers, marble work, and ornate plaster molding, positioning it as “one of the most spectacular ballrooms ever built in the world.” Eric Trump also pointed out that the East Wing of the White House is “totally underutilized,” signaling a need for this new space.
In a sharp rebuttal, Hakeem Jeffries accused President Trump of orchestrating “the largest pay-to-play scheme in the history of the country,” suggesting that the project invites undue influence from donors. “It is highly doubtful this project is legal and it should be investigated,” Jeffries added.
“You will be investigated if you’re paying for Trump’s illegal WH ballroom,” Jeffries warned, highlighting the seriousness of his allegations.
As the controversy unfolds, the public remains divided on the implications of the ballroom project. Supporters of the president argue it enhances the historical significance of the White House, while critics express concern over transparency and potential ethical violations.
With the ballroom’s construction underway, it is clear this debate is far from over. What happens next as investigations loom and public opinion shifts will be critical to watch in the coming weeks.
Stay tuned for updates on this developing story as it continues to capture national attention.
