UPDATE: Megyn Kelly is under fire after controversial comments made during her SiriusXM show this week regarding Jeffrey Epstein’s crimes. Kelly suggested that Epstein should not be labeled a “pedophile,” stating he preferred “very young teen types,” specifically citing 15-year-old girls. The backlash has been swift and intense, with critics accusing her of downplaying the severity of Epstein’s abuse.
During the broadcast, Kelly claimed that an unnamed source “very, very close to the case” indicated that Epstein “liked the barely legal type,” prompting widespread condemnation. “He liked 15-year-old girls,” she remarked, labeling the situation as “disgusting,” yet asserting that there is a significant distinction between a 15-year-old and a 5-year-old. This controversial remark has sparked outrage, especially as many argue it minimizes the impact of Epstein’s actions.
Kelly’s comments came amidst her skepticism regarding statements made by former Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi, who alleged Epstein possessed thousands of graphic videos involving minors. Kelly noted she once believed Epstein was “an actual pedophile,” but expressed doubt about Bondi’s credibility in the case.
The fallout from her remarks has been immediate. On Wednesday night, The Daily Show host Josh Johnson aired the segment, expressing disbelief at Kelly’s arguments. “How the hell was Megyn Kelly ever an attorney?” he questioned, sarcastically labeling her perspective as a form of “diet pedophilia.” Johnson emphasized, “Everyone knows there is a big difference between a 15-year-old and a 5-year-old. But everyone also knows there is never a good reason to be talking about that difference.”
Online critics have echoed Johnson’s sentiments, arguing that Kelly’s framing of Epstein’s actions minimizes sexual abuse. Advocacy groups for survivors have condemned her comments, stating that any distinction made is harmful, as Epstein’s actions involved minors who were incapable of legal consent, regardless of age.
As the backlash continues to grow, Kelly has not issued any further statements addressing the controversy. The public outcry highlights the need for sensitivity around discussions of abuse, particularly in cases involving minors.
As this situation develops, many are left questioning the implications of Kelly’s remarks on public perception of sexual abuse and exploitation. Advocates are urging for a more nuanced understanding of these serious issues, emphasizing the importance of recognizing the gravity of Epstein’s crimes.
This incident serves as a reminder of the ongoing dialogue surrounding sexual abuse, consent, and the societal perceptions of such heinous acts. The urgency of this issue cannot be overstated, as discussions continue to unfold in public forums.
Stay tuned for updates on this developing story as authorities and advocacy groups respond to Kelly’s statements and the broader implications for survivors of abuse.
